In the heart of Nigeria’s vibrant creative tapestry, where stories come alive through music, theatre, and film, a shadow looms over the legacy of one of its esteemed artists. Chief Olalere Osunpaimo, affectionately known as Lere Paimo, stands at a critical crossroads in a harrowing battle for intellectual property rights. His lament over the potential unauthorized remake of his beloved film, Ogbori Elemoso, raises alarm bells not only for his personal legacy but for the very fabric of artistic integrity in Nigeria. This striking incident is not merely a dispute between an artist and those in power; it is a clarion call for the protection of cultural heritage, creative rights, and the dignity of all who dare to share their narratives.
Paimo’s experience highlights a troubling violation of artistic ownership. Having dedicated years to creating Ogbori Elemoso, a film that beautifully encapsulates Yoruba history and cultural nuances, the thought of its unauthorized remake is not just a personal affront; it is an affront to a community and its heritage. This film is more than a piece of art for Paimo; it is a testament to his experiences, struggles, and triumphs as an artist. When powerful individuals, such as the Soun of Ogbomoso, attempt to dilute that legacy through unauthorized adaptations, they risk erasing significant stories that resonate within the cultural identity of the Yoruba people.
In his pursuit of protecting his work, Paimo illustrates the precarious balance between creativity and exploitation. His initial agreement to consider a remake highlights his willingness to engage in dialogue; however, the subsequent actions of Fewchore Studio, claiming they do not need his permission, epitomise a flagrant disregard for his rights. This power dynamic reflects a broader systemic issue in the entertainment industry, where the scale often tips in favour of those with financial backing rather than the creators who pour their hearts into their work.
Moreover, the emotional toll of this battle cannot be underestimated. Paimo’s recounting of his journey to produce Ogbori Elemoso exposes the sacrifices he made, including incurring significant debts to bring his vision to life. The threat of losing his legacy through a remake orchestrated without his consent can lead to feelings of betrayal and hopelessness. Many artists in his position experience similar emotional distress; the uncertainty surrounding their intellectual property disrupts their creative processes and can lead to anxiety and a diminishing sense of self-worth.
This brings us to a deeper truth shared by many in the artistic community: the majority of these gifted individuals pursue their crafts out of sheer passion, often at great personal expense. With little financial attachment, they invest their time and talent, dreaming of the day their art might bring them recognition or, dare we say, comfort. Tragically, many of these talented souls have left this world in abject poverty, their brilliance unrecognised and their stories untold. This stark reality serves as a painful reminder of the systemic neglect that plagues the creative landscape.
Paimo’s plight intersects with this broader narrative of silent suffering experienced by countless artists in Nigeria. His story is not unique; it mirrors the struggles of creatives who grapple with fears of exploitation and inadequate legal protections. Feeling unsupported, many brilliant artists hesitate to speak out, fearing retribution or further marginalisation within an industry that can be unforgiving.
As we transition from discussing Paimo’s specific case to the general landscape facing Nigerian artists, it becomes increasingly clear that his struggle highlights a pervasive need for comprehensive reform. Legislators and policymakers have a crucial role to play in safeguarding the rights of creators. By enacting and enforcing robust intellectual property laws, they can provide the frameworks necessary for artists to protect their work. This includes not only updating existing regulations to reflect modern challenges but also ensuring that these laws are accessible and understandable.
Collaboration among stakeholders—industry organisations, unions, advocacy groups, and educational institutions—must support artists in their quest for justice. By amplifying the voices of creators and providing the essential resources they need, we can foster an environment where artistic expression flourishes rather than flounders.
In conclusion, the urgent need for systemic reform and societal change arises from Lere Paimo’s experience and the collective suffering of countless artists. By addressing the complexities surrounding intellectual property rights while championing the perspectives of creators facing similar challenges, Nigeria can develop a thriving artistic landscape that honours its cultural heritage and supports the dignity of all who contribute to it.
The combined efforts of lawmakers, industry stakeholders, and the public can strengthen the foundation upon which our creative industries stand. Balancing these interests is vital for fostering an environment where artists are respected, protected, and empowered, ensuring that the rich narratives of the past continue to resonate in the future. With collective action and unwavering support, we can make the artistic community a sanctuary for creativity and innovation, where trauma gives way to triumph, and voices are not only heard but celebrated.
Copyright © 2025 Fẹ́mi Akínṣọlá. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author.
