The recent decision by the Federal Government of Nigeria to abolish the national policy mandating the use of indigenous languages as the medium of instruction in schools in favour of English raises urgent concerns about cultural identity, educational equity, and the holistic development of future generations. This policy reversal, proclaimed by Minister of Education Dr. Tunji Alausa, is not merely a shift in educational strategy; it is a profound affront to Nigeria’s rich linguistic heritage and a dangerous step away from inclusive education. By enforcing English as the sole medium of instruction, the government risks not only deepening societal divides but also perpetuating a cycle of educational failure and cultural disintegration.
To fully understand the implications of this decision, it is essential to examine the historical context behind the push for English as the primary language of instruction. The promotion of English reflects lingering colonial attitudes that favour a foreign language over indigenous languages, thereby perpetuating a legacy of cultural imperialism. This historical perspective sheds light on the broader implications of choosing English: it not only reinforces existing power dynamics but also alienates entire communities from their cultural heritage and identity.
Furthermore, the assertion that teaching in mother tongues has resulted in poor educational outcomes oversimplifies the complexities of Nigeria’s education system. While high failure rates in key examinations such as WAEC, NECO, and JAMB are alarming, research has consistently shown that bilingual education enhances cognitive development, critical thinking, and overall academic success. Studies indicate that students who receive instruction in their mother tongue perform better academically, particularly in later academic pursuits where foundational comprehension is crucial. Ignoring the wealth of evidence supporting bilingual education is a disservice to the nation’s youth.
Additionally, the decision to eradicate indigenous languages from the classroom threatens to exacerbate societal divisions. Languages are vital for fostering unity and understanding within diverse communities. By enforcing English exclusively, the government risks creating an environment where tribalism and social fragmentation become more pronounced, undermining social cohesion and stability in a country already facing significant ethnic challenges.
Contrasting Nigeria’s policy with global trends reveals a stark divergence from best practices in education. Countries that prioritise multilingual education—such as Canada, India, and New Zealand—have witnessed enhanced educational outcomes and successful cultural preservation. These nations understand that promoting indigenous languages alongside global languages like English can enrich both the educational experience and the cultural fabric of society. Nigeria should learn from these examples and adopt a more inclusive educational framework.
The economic implications of this policy cannot be overlooked. A poorly educated workforce, arising from ineffective language instruction, could hinder Nigeria’s national development and its competitiveness in a global economy. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, a workforce that lacks proficiency in multiple languages may find itself at a disadvantage, limiting opportunities for growth and innovation.
Moreover, the state of teacher preparedness is an essential element to consider. In communities where students have limited exposure to English, the challenges faced by teachers required to conduct lessons exclusively in English become insurmountable. This lack of training in both English and indigenous languages makes it imperative that the government invests in professional development for educators. A bilingual education model would empower teachers and provide students with the foundation they need for comprehensive learning.
Community involvement plays an equally crucial role in education. Indigenous languages often encompass unique local knowledge and values, which are vital for contextually relevant education. Removing these languages from the curriculum strips education of local significance, diminishing the role of communities in the learning process and potentially alienating parents and students alike.
The psychological effects on students must also be addressed. Forcing children to learn in a language they do not fully understand can lead to feelings of inadequacy and discouragement, undermining their self-esteem and overall mental health. Education should be a source of empowerment, yet this policy threatens to disenfranchise those very students it intends to serve.
From a legal and human rights perspective, the decision raises serious concerns regarding children’s rights to education in their own languages. This aligns with international agreements such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which emphasises the importance of language in cultural identity. By sidelining indigenous languages, the government risks violating these fundamental rights.
Lastly, it is essential to explore alternative models of education that successfully integrate indigenous languages alongside English. Several countries have managed to create educational systems that promote bilingualism, providing valuable lessons for Nigeria. These examples highlight that effective education does not require the sacrifice of cultural identity, demonstrating that it is indeed possible to celebrate linguistic diversity while equipping students for global citizenship.
In conclusion, the cancellation of the mother tongue policy represents a grave misstep for Nigeria’s educational landscape, one that threatens to erode cultural identities, oversimplify complex educational challenges, and perpetuate social and economic inequalities. The Federal Government must recognise the invaluable role that indigenous languages play in fostering inclusive education and cultural preservation. Rather than enforcing English as the sole medium of instruction, policymakers should advocate for a bilingual education system that honours linguistic diversity while ensuring that all students have the tools needed to succeed in an increasingly globalised world. This is not merely an educational issue; it is a question of national identity, social justice, and the right of every Nigerian child to receive an education that respects and uplifts their cultural heritage.
Copyright © 2025 Fẹ́mi Akínṣọlá. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author.
